Cases 1 - 10 of 19,167
Bolden v. Jester
as 4:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Brandon Keith Bolden
Respondent:
T. Jester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mastrom v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Mastrom
Defendant:
Jr. Robert Adams
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
McKinney, Jr. v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv02554
Plaintiff:
Charlie McKinney, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Floyd County Sheriff et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Alvin S. Chambers
Defendant:
Floyd County Sheriff, Sgt. Barton, Sgt. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv02514
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv02515
Plaintiff:
Leon Moss
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Sheriff Patrick Labat and Albernisha Blackman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gobert v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Michael James Gobert
Respondent:
Warden James Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carson v. Pounds et al
as 1:2024cv02488
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allyn Carson
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Pounds, Head Nurse Germany and Douglas Count Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Spalding County Law Authorities
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Charles Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Spalding County Law Authorities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
