Cases 1 - 10 of 297
Wingfield v. Pham
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wingfield
Defendant:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv01751
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Warden William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McElrath v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Damian Cornell McElrath
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Cobb County - GA, U.S. Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Julius Dorsey
Defendant:
Russell W. Smith and Chan B. Caudell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv00985
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Lt. Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollowell v. Tripp
as 1:2024cv00659
Petitioner:
Jo'Von Montell Hollowell
Respondent:
Warden B. Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Mentoring Ministry for the Homeless with Disabilities et al
as 1:2023cv05345
Plaintiff:
Gregory Earl Murphy, Sr.
Defendant:
Mentoring Ministry for the Homeless with Disabilities, Kathleen Marie Flynn, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Thomas
as 4:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
David B. Howell
Defendant:
K. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akande v. United States
as 1:2023cv03991
Petitioner:
Kolawole B. Akande
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
