Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Fiorito v. Martin et al
as 1:2021cv03802
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Defendant:
Dr. Martin, The United States, A. W. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Castillo v. Wood et al
as 1:2021cv01222
Defendant:
Mr. Bowers, Captian Gillard, V. Moreno and others
Plaintiff:
Jaime Y. Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSS v. JEFFERSON et al
as 1:2020cv01683
Defendant:
REPORTING OFFICER DAVID H WHITE, Dr. Wilcox, WARDEN TRACEY JEFFERSON and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dawud v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2012cv02928
Plaintiff:
Wali Malik Dawud
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawud v. Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles Members et al
as 1:2010cv02564
Plaintiff:
Wali Malik Dawud
Defendant:
Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles Members, John Does, L. Gale Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosdale v. Thompson et al
as 1:2010cv02030
Petitioner:
Dwight Lee Crosdale
Respondent:
Dannie Thompson and Michael J. Bower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crosdale v. Thompson et al
as 1:2010cv01693
Petitioner:
Dwight Lee Crosdale
Respondent:
Dannie Thompson and Michael J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glover v. Thompson et al
as 1:2010cv01503
Petitioner:
Xavier B. Glover
Respondent:
Dannie Thompson, Michael J. Bowers and Brian Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pina v. City of Atlanta Police Department et al
as 1:2009cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bernardo A. Pina
Defendant:
City of Atlanta Police Department, L. Bower, M. A. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pina v. City of Atlanta Police Department et al
as 1:2008cv03928
Plaintiff:
Bernardo A. Pina
Defendant:
City of Atlanta Police Department, L. Bower, M. A. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
