Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thomas v. Cheetwood et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Thomas
Defendant:
Richard Cheetwood, William Calcutt, Matthew Medert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv02601
Petitioner:
Clifford Deangelo Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bates v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Bates
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Judge Raquel Pope and Sheriff Lablat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04461
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Clark, Leroy Rogers, DeAngelo Cook and others
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Sutton Richardson, Stephen Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01789
Petitioner:
Qadir Shabazz, Deangelo Moore and Deangelo Muhammad
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
COOK v. MCLAUGHLIN
as 1:2016cv01406
Petitioner:
DEANGELO COOK
Respondent:
Gregory McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Perkins
as 1:2013cv03599
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Wright
Respondent:
Steve Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright et al v. Grubbs et al
as 1:2011cv03129
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Jean Wright and United States
Respondent:
Addele Grubbs and Neil Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thompson v. Clayton County Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jamel DeAngelo Thompson
Defendant:
Clayton County Judicial Circuit, Erman J. Tanjuatco, William H. Ison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Burnette
as 1:2009cv00667
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Cook
Respondent:
Fred Burnette and Thurbert Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
