Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Forte v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv04378
Petitioner:
Calvin Deondre Forte
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Fort
as 1:2022cv04710
Petitioner:
Delmon Peters
Respondent:
Karl Fort and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKenzie v. Ford
as 1:2022cv04577
Petitioner:
Jermaine McKenzie
Respondent:
Warden Karl Ford and Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. FORT
as 1:2022cv04490
Petitioner:
MARVIN A SCOTT
Respondent:
Georgia Department of Corrections and Warden Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manning v. Fort et al
as 1:2022cv04288
Petitioner:
Marvin Manning
Respondent:
Warden Fort and Augusta State Medical Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miles v. Anthony et al
as 1:2022cv03805
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jerome Miles
Defendant:
C/O Anthony, DW Mims, DW Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridley v. Ward et al
as 1:2022cv03507
Plaintiff:
Edward Tyrone Ridley
Defendant:
Commissioner Timothy Ward, Warden Lawrence Wittington, Warden Ford Jackson Diagnostic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenny v. Fort
as 1:2022cv00854
Petitioner:
Walter Lawrence Kenny and Walter Lawrence Kenney
Respondent:
Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KENNEY v. FORT
as 1:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
WALTER LAWRENCE KENNEY
Respondent:
WARDEN CARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boone v. Barnard et al
as 1:2021cv04325
Plaintiff:
Verdis Nathaniel Boone
Defendant:
Terry E. Barnard, Dick Donovan and Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
