Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Maslow v. Warden et al
as 1:2022cv04351
Petitioner:
Thomas Maslow
Respondent:
Warden, Honorable Mrs. Suzanne Smith and Mrs. Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maslow v. Warden et al
as 4:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Thomas Maslow
Respondent:
Warden, Honorable Mrs. Suzanne Smith, Mrs. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toliver v. Labat et al
as 1:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Patrick Steven Toliver
Defendant:
Patrick Labat, Dr. Pompey, Fulton County Detention, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Georgia Dept. of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities et al
as 1:2021cv05207
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
Georgia Dept. of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Judy Fritzgerald, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Adams et al
as 1:2021cv00514
Respondent:
Brian Adams and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Petitioner:
Ahmad Rashad Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gill v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2018cv05884
Defendant:
Gwinnett Detention Center, Brian Robinson and Deputy Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Stanley Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisum v. Gill et al
as 4:2018cv00255
Defendant:
Kelly Dial, Kecaston Gill and Kearston Gill
Plaintiff:
Willie Q. Chisum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2016cv00669
Plaintiff:
Gregory Rutledge, Jr.
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Tunisia Gill and Kerry Slim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Drew
as 1:2014cv01898
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Gill, Jr.
Respondent:
Darlene Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roper v. Gill
as 2:2013cv00270
Plaintiff:
Oscar Leshan Roper
Defendant:
Gill and Hall County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
