Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Pruitt v. McDade et al
as 1:2019cv05240
Plaintiff:
Leslie Sean Pruitt
Defendant:
Sheriff Waldrop, David McDade, Jerry Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Brooks et al
as 1:2019cv03113
Plaintiff:
Leslie Sean Pruitt
Defendant:
Rodney McCloud, Warden Nathan Brooks and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Brooks et al
as 1:2019cv03099
Plaintiff:
Leslie Sean Pruitt
Defendant:
Warden Brooks, Desiree Ajamkiewioz and Nathan Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Etowah Sheriffs Dept et al
as 1:2018cv03551
Plaintiff:
Leslie Sean Pruitt
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriffs Dept, Etowah Sheriffs Dept and Georgia Govener Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. State of Georgia
as 2:2018cv00109
Petitioner:
Tony Pruitt
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stuart v. Hall County Detention Medical Staff et al
as 2:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
James R Stuart
Defendant:
Hall County Detention Medical Staff, State of Georgia, Zoller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart v. Hall County Detention Center et al
as 2:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
James R Stuart
Defendant:
Hall County Detention Center, Medical Staff, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart v. Hall County Detention Center et al
as 2:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
James R Stuart
Defendant:
Hall County Detention Center, Medical Staff, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart v. Hall County Detention Center et al
as 2:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
James R Stuart
Defendant:
Hall County Detention Center, Medical Staff, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Hall
as 1:2018cv00240
Petitioner:
Leslie Sean Pruitt
Respondent:
Phillip Hall
Defendant:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
