Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Smith v. United States Uthinization Order Facility et al
as 1:2023cv03872
Plaintiff:
Brit'tani Michael Smith and Michael Jordan
Defendant:
United States Uthinization Order Facility, Alabama State Police, Mississippi State Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Rose et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Seneca Colbert
Defendant:
Deputy Rose, Sheriff Labat and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toliver v. Labat et al
as 1:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Patrick Steven Toliver
Defendant:
Patrick Labat, Dr. Pompey, Fulton County Detention, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovelace v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv03010
Defendant:
Medical Staff & Doctors of Rose Gillmoore at Central State Hospital, on File!, Clayton County, Rose Gillmoore/State of Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Lovelace, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Ziegler et al
as 1:2018cv02914
Plaintiff:
Roland Mathis
Defendant:
Joel Ziegler, Coakley, D. L. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Mills et al
as 1:2017cv02778
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Rose
Defendant:
James W. Mills, Terry Barnard, Jacqueline Bunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rose v. Morris et al
as 4:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Rose
Defendant:
Cindy Morris and Melica Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. State of Georgia, et al et al
as 4:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
State of Georgia, et al, Polk County Georgia, et al, Baldwin County CSH Georgia, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Brown
as 1:2015cv03693
Petitioner:
Marty Steven Rose
Respondent:
Ezell Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rose v. Zych et al
as 1:2015cv02619
Plaintiff:
Carl Rose
Defendant:
C. Zych, Mark Ryain, Lovett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
