Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Martin v. Wilkes
as 1:2023cv01998
Petitioner: Marvin Martin
Respondent: Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. Wilkes
as 1:2023cv01233
Petitioner: Sentavious Leonard
Defendant: Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. Scottwilkes
as 1:2023cv01199
Petitioner: Sentavious Leonard
Respondent: Warden Scottwilkes and Warden Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salahuddin v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2022cv05163
Petitioner: Autley I. Salahuddin, II
Respondent: Warden Scott Wilkes and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Wilkes
as 1:2022cv03102
Petitioner: Merease Gordon
Respondent: Warden Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Wilkes
as 1:2017cv03821
Petitioner: Randall Young
Respondent: Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Wilkes et al
as 4:2017cv00216
Plaintiff: Kendrick R. Martin
Defendant: Scott Wilkes, Antonio Ross and Serena Chance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv03455
Plaintiff: Joseph Tiger D. Prince
Defendant: Stan Shepard, Georgia Department of Corrections, Elizabeth Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WILKES
as 1:2017cv03325
Petitioner: JOHN HOKE SMITH
Respondent: Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Wilkes, et al
as 4:2017cv00209
Plaintiff: Kendrick R. Martin
Defendant: Scott Wilkes, Antonio Bass and Serena Chance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?