Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03476
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Woodard v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv03414
Defendant:
Karen Pass, Tammie Mosley, JoDi Spiegl and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Woodard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Ward
as 1:2024cv03317
Respondent:
Timothy Ward
Petitioner:
Geno West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Timothy Ward and Terry E Barnard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Ward
as 1:2024cv00460
Petitioner:
Geno West
Respondent:
Timothy Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West v. Ward
as 1:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
Geno West
Respondent:
Timothy Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sumrall v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv05395
Plaintiff:
Ammon Ra Sumrall
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Timothy Ward, Alan Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowder et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2023cv04732
Plaintiff:
Donald Crowder, Solomon Thompson, Timothy Bowen and others
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Terry E. Barnard, Jacqueline Bunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Barnard et al
as 1:2023cv04230
Plaintiff:
William M. Taylor
Defendant:
Terry E. Barnard, Jacqueline Bunn, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Ward et al
as 1:2023cv03664
Plaintiff:
Ahmoud Renault Barber
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Tyrone Oliver and Unit Manager Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
