Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Springer v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv02076
Defendant:
FBOP, Warden, United States Penitentiary, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Springer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION et al
as 1:2019cv03062
Defendant:
State of Georgia, American Civil Liberties Union, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
TEKEEMA TOCCARA MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. ACLU et al
as 3:2019cv00060
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Caretha Williams, ACLU and others
Petitioner:
Takeema Toccara Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Moore v. United States Department of Justice (BOP)
as 1:2017cv01342
Petitioner:
Richard L. Moore
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Smith v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2013cv00752
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Smith
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles E. Samuals, Jr. and others
Harris v. DeKalb County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv01028
Plaintiff:
Tavares Douglas Harris
Defendant:
DeKalb County Sheriff's Department and Inhoused Entity of United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wattleton v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2011cv03660
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
