Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Price v. CCS et al
as 1:2018cv04439
Plaintiff:
Antonio Pachino Price
Defendant:
Rockdale County Jail Medical Divison, CCS, Correction Care Solutions Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Schindler Elevator Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv04061
Plaintiff:
Michelle Dukes
Defendant:
John Doe 1-3, Otis Elevator Company, Schindler Elevator Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. Humphrey et al
as 4:2018cv00181
Defendant:
FNU McGaba, FNU Harvey, Timothy Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meggs et al v. Goosebumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01893
Plaintiff:
Shannon Meggs , Brandy L. Miller , Denise O. Weir and others
Defendant:
Goosebumps, Inc., Bruce Dobbs, George Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Jones v. Goosebumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02809
Plaintiff:
Cariletta Smith Jones
Defendant:
Goosebumps, Inc., Bruce Dobbs, George Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Jackson et al v. Goosebumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02669
Plaintiff:
Ebony Jackson and Alitha Jackson
Defendant:
Goosebumps, Inc., Bruce Dobbs, George Ross Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Love et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01016
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Love , Tinna Dobbs Beebout , Beth Amelia Beebout and others
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Johnson v. Hargrove et al
as 1:2017cv00923
Plaintiff:
Damon Johnson
Defendant:
Donnie Hargrove and Dobbs & Company Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Modis, Inc. v. Dobbs
as 1:2015cv03739
Plaintiff:
Modis, Inc.
Defendant:
Allison Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dobbs v. Atkins et al
as 1:2015cv00360
Plaintiff:
Henry Louis Dobbs
Defendant:
Matt Atkins, Bonnie K. Smith and Lorraine Silvo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
