Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Romero v. Irving Tissue Company Limited et al
as 1:2021mi00074
Plaintiff:
Miguel Romero
Defendant:
Irving Tissue Company Limited and Distribution Unlimited, Inc.
Romero v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02765
Plaintiff:
Odalis M. Hernandez Romero
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Romero v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01745
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Teva Women's Health LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alma Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Romero v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02594
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Frank Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guzman v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv02669
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Agent M. Jones and Agent J. Reed
Plaintiff:
Roberto Romero Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02566
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1451
Mendoza-Perez et al v. Dhillon
as 1:2019cv00722
Plaintiff:
Santana Cardenas, Victor Manuel Sanchez, Eduardo Lopez-Romero and others
Defendant:
Uttam Dhillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arreola-Romero v. United States
as 1:2019cv00748
Petitioner:
Martin Arreola-Romero
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Beranger et al v. Harris et al
as 1:2018cv05054
Plaintiff:
Petr Rasplicka, Jaroslav Trubac, Romero Hennep and others
Defendant:
Clifford "T.I." Joseph Harris, Jr. and Ryan Felton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Griffin v. Harmon et al
as 1:2018cv03073
Plaintiff:
Marvin Griffin
Defendant:
D. J. Harmon, J. A. Keller, AW Mackenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
