Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 912
Lay v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv02005
Petitioner: Michael Antonio Lay
Respondent: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00111
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Stocks v. City of Rome et al
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Keith Obryann Stocks, Keith Obryann Stocks Trust, Keith Obryann Stocks Estate and others
Defendant: City of Rome, Floyd County Sheriff's Department, 2 Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milner v. Unknown
as 1:2024mi00027
Plaintiff: Ebone' Milner
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Guthrie v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv01603
Plaintiff: Wylie Guthrie
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckmann v. Capital One Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv01448
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon, Capital One Financial Corp., Newrez, LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and others
Plaintiff: Karen D. Beckmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Smith v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01468
Plaintiff: Lionesha Diana Smith
Defendant: State of Georgia, Chris Carr, Danielle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Turman v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv01444
Plaintiff: Senika Gomare Turman
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Unknown
as 1:2024mi00020
Plaintiff: Itzell Miller
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Brock v. Unknown
as 1:2024mi00019
Plaintiff: Darrel Brock, Jr.
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?