Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Escobar v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00128
Petitioner:
Eliud Rios Escobar
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rios v. Citifinancial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02390
Plaintiff:
Richard Rios
Defendant:
Citifinancial Services, Inc. , First Family Financial Services of Georgia, Inc. and American Bankers Life Assurance Company of Florida
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Galarzo et al v. Mulkey Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01011
Plaintiff:
Anselmo Galarzo , Sidronio Galarzo , Noe Galarzo and others
Defendant:
Mulkey Enterprises, Inc. and Haro Construction Company, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Mulkey Enterprises, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Haro Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Turbine & Machine Works, Inc. v. Colturbinas, LTDA. et al
as 1:2011cv00533
Plaintiff:
Turbine & Machine Works, Inc.
Defendant:
Colturbinas, LTDA. and Acerias Paz Del Rio, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Escalera et al v. Stankunas Concrete, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00251
Plaintiff:
Jose Remedios Escalera , Pedro Trujillo , Carlos Rios Escalera and others
Defendant:
Stankunas Concrete, Inc. and Frank Stankunas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Mitchum et al v. United Recycling, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03692
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mitchum, Ruben Sanchez-Rios and William D. Brown
Defendant:
United Recycling, Inc., United Recycling Transportation, LLC and Ariel Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Maria Fidelia-Rios Velasquez
as 1:2010mj01393
Defendant:
Maria Fidelia-Rios Velasquez
Plaintiff:
USA
Rios et al v. Bell's Complete Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02311
Plaintiff:
Juan Mendoza Rios and Carlos Pacheco
Defendant:
Bell's Complete Landscaping, Inc. and Michael Bell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
