Cases 81 - 90 of 543
Property Services of Atlanta v. Johnson
as 4:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Property Services of Atlanta
Defendant:
Kelly Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kiser v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04422
Plaintiff:
Kellie L. Kiser
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Branded Pharmaceuticals Products R&D, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floorcoverings International, LTD., v. Thomas et al
as 1:2021cv04430
Plaintiff:
Floorcoverings International, LTD.
Defendant:
Keith Thomas, Kelly Thomas and AST Floors, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kollaja v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04096
Plaintiff:
Kelly Kollaja
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SBA TOWERS X, LLC v. Douglas County, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04058
Plaintiff:
SBA TOWERS X, LLC
Defendant:
Douglas County, Georgia, Romona Jackson Jones, Henry Mitchell, III and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332
Shroyer v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03939
Plaintiff:
Kelly Shroyer
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
