Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Pearson v. Metro Transitional Center et al
as 2:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Chaplain Anderson, Metro Transitional Center, Chief Gillette and others
Plaintiff:
Sandtoro E. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Metro Transitional Center et al
as 1:2021cv00785
Defendant:
Chaplain Anderson, Metro Transitional Center, Chief Gillette and others
Plaintiff:
Sandtoro E. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00020
Plaintiff:
Damon Young
Defendant:
RN Cocran, Alisa Evans, Jack Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Ward et al
as 4:2020cv00252
Defendant:
Matthew Kenndy, Kim Stewart, Jack Koon and others
Plaintiff:
Damon Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Sapp et al
as 4:2019cv00285
Plaintiff:
Byron Lavoy Garrett, Sr.
Defendant:
Chaplain David Thornton, Major Robert G. Sapp and Sgt. Debra McCain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv05062
Defendant:
James D. Smith, The State of Georgia, Commissioner, State Chaplain, Ga. Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
David Timothy Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkinson v. Hill et al
as 1:2019cv04671
Defendant:
Chaplain Davis, Mrs. Johnson and Victor Hill
Plaintiff:
Shaunte LeRoy Adkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyles v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv05387
Plaintiff:
Torrick T. Lyles
Defendant:
Officer Monroe, Operation Lieutenant, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MONEY v. ATLANTA CITY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2008cv02247
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. MONEY
Defendant:
Atlanta City Detention Center, ACDC WARDEN, Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
