Cases 1 - 10 of 912
Blyden v. Unknown
as 1:2024mi00044
Plaintiff:
Anthony Craig Blyden
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Scott v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv02333
Plaintiff:
James E. Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. A Tract of land lying and being in Henry County, Georgia known as 479 Crosshaven Way, McDonough, Georgia (Tax Parcel No. 070A01117000) et al
as 1:2024cv02262
Petitioner:
Michael C. Harris
Respondent:
A Tract of land lying and being in Henry County, Georgia known as 479 Crosshaven Way, McDonough, Georgia (Tax Parcel No. 070A01117000), Elizabeth M. Sneed, Michael E. Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Sifuentes v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Roel Sifuentes
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Unknown
as 1:2024mi00032
Plaintiff:
Itzell-Elizabeth Miller
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Boykin v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tyrone Boykin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv02005
Petitioner:
Michael Antonio Lay
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lay v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Michael Antonio Lay
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
