Cases 61 - 70 of 1,892
Quarterman v. Scott
as 5:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Garnell Quarterman
Defendant:
Ms. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Chatham County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Wilson, II
Defendant:
Chatham County Jail, Dr. Stocfish, Dr. Vedestro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. GRIFFIN et al
as 3:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Cross
Defendant:
SABRIYA GRIFFIN and Attorney Chavene B. King, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Harmon et al
as 1:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wade Payne
Defendant:
Unit Manager Mr. Harmon, Warden Philbin, Warden Ms. Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primas v. State of Georgia et al
as 6:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kertemus Primas
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Warden Brian Adams, Chaplain Bernard Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Coffee Correctional Facility
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Barnes
Defendant:
Coffee Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. The United States et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Kadeem Demund Lewis
Defendant:
The United States, Officer Watts, Officer Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Roberts et al
as 5:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jenkins
Defendant:
Lee Roberts, Nurse Wendy, Dr. Bagwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Charles B. Webster Detention Center et al
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jamario Anderson
Defendant:
Charles B. Webster Detention Center, Cease Moore and Jaylen Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. PARIKH
as 6:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT HARRISON, JR
Defendant:
JYOLI PARIKH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
