Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plump v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
William Matthew Plump
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00429
Petitioner:
Tu Anh Nguyen
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
George William Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tran v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00351
Petitioner:
Sanh Binh Tran
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
William F. McGinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Krause v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00190
Petitioner:
Kyle William Krause
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams, II v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00327
Petitioner:
Leroy Williams, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00088
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Addidas Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Batten v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00163
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
William Walter Batten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00411
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Kevin Darnell Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00220
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Roshon Deshae Tramaine Williams
Interested Party:
Erin Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Trimble v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00175
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
William Trimble, Jr. and William fortTrimble, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
