Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Rodriguez-Valdovinos v. USA
as 4:2012cv00327
Petitioner:
Rolando Rodriguez-Valdovinos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sandoval-Rodriguez v. USA
as 4:2012cv00229
Petitioner:
Patricio Sandoval-Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jo et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents
as 4:2011cv00603
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo and Raul Melecio-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Six Unknown Name Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hepker v. Public Defenders Office et al
as 4:2010cv00436
Plaintiff:
Myran David Hepker
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office, Tomas Rodriguez, Brian Sissel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melecio-Rodriguez v. Six Unknown Name Agents
as 4:2010cv00391
Plaintiff:
Raul Melecio-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Six Unknown Name Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melecio-Rodriguez v. Six Unknown Name Agents et al
as 4:2010cv00331
Plaintiff:
Raul Melecio-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Six Unknown Name Agents and Barack Hussein Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez Rodriguez v. Fayram
as 4:2009cv00429
Petitioner:
Luis Gomez Rodriguez
Respondent:
John Fayram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramon-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv00196
Petitioner:
Isabel Ramon-Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodriguez-Garcia v. United States of America
as 4:2008cv00045
Petitioner:
Artemio Rodriguez-Garcia
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Santamaria-Rodriguez v. USA
as 4:2007cv00426
Petitioner:
Juan Francisco Santamaria-Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
