Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Farmer v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00344
Petitioner:
Chovontae Martise Farmer
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Murray Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Riepe v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00281
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
John Michael Riepe
Interested Party:
Murray Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Garza v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garza
Defendant:
Tonia Baldwin, Debra Murray, Jeffrey Gustafson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Howard et al
as 4:2016cv00446
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Thompson
Defendant:
Shawn Howard, Bob Riddle, Deb Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Thompson v. Vrba et al
as 4:2015cv00306
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Thompson
Defendant:
Tiffany Vrba, Shawn Howard, Bob Riddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steen et al v. Murray et al.,
as 1:2012cv00031
Defendant:
Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP. , Robert Murray and Ryan Boe
Plaintiff:
Richard Steen and Lloydene Steen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Steen et al v. Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP. et al
as 4:2012cv00531
Defendant:
Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP. , Robert Murray and Ryan Boe
Plaintiff:
Richard Steen and Lloydene Steen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Steen et al v. Murray et al
as 1:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Richard Steen and Lloydene Steen
Defendant:
Robert Murray, Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP. and Ryan Boe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burton v. Lund et al
as 4:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jacob Zachary Burton
Defendant:
Mark Lund, Tonya Baldwin, Any and All Unnamed Persons Involved Working at CCF/DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
