Cases 1 - 10 of 10
King v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Brandon King
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 90
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0159 Labor: Violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Belger et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2008cv00013
Plaintiff:
John William Belger and John William Belger
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Neff v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00039
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Neff
Defendant:
United Parcel Service of America, Inc. and Broadspire Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Neff v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00328
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Neff
Defendant:
United Parcel Service of America, Inc. and Broadspire Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
