Cases 41 - 50 of 217
Worman v. Warden of FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01335
Petitioner:
John Worman
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hall v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01308
Petitioner:
Chadwick D Hall
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mitchell v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2022cv01302
Petitioner:
Morris Mitchell
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tucker v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2022cv01263
Petitioner:
Anthony A Tucker
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sykes v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01252
Petitioner:
Overtis Sykes
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crayton v. Warden Chester Mental Health
as 2:2022cv02134
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
Warden Chester Mental Health
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whatley v. Williams
as 3:2022cv03105
Petitioner:
Lamar Edward Whatley
Respondent:
Warden Williams
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swopes v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Sherman Swopes
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Samuels v. Segal
as 1:2022cv01175
Petitioner:
Derrick Samuels
Respondent:
Warden Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hull v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01173
Petitioner:
Daniel R Hull
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
