Cases 61 - 70 of 217
Douglas v. Warden of FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01106
Petitioner:
John Joseph Douglas
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Redmond v. Segal
as 1:2022cv01105
Petitioner:
Dara Briann Redmond
Respondent:
Warden Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Funtila v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01103
Petitioner:
Kathy Funtila
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Monical v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01098
Petitioner:
Karen Sawyer Monical
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mills v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01099
Petitioner:
Kandis Mills
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kohl v. Segal
as 1:2022cv01096
Petitioner:
Kristina Lynn Kohl
Respondent:
Warden Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trevino v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2022cv01092
Petitioner:
Macarena Trevino
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tipton v. Warden B. Greene
as 1:2022cv01056
Petitioner:
Darnell Tipton
Respondent:
Warden B. Greene
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelton v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01045
Petitioner:
Milton Terry Kelton
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 2:2022cv02038
Petitioner:
Tavoris Smith
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
