Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,117
Wooden v. Beggs
as 3:2024cv03156
Plaintiff: Vanessa Wooden
Defendant: Dustin Beggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Green et al
as 3:2024cv03152
Plaintiff: Adam Titus
Defendant: Brittany Green, Tara Goins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slaughter v. Mr. Walter
as 1:2024cv01217
Petitioner: Jennifer Slaughter
Respondent: Mr. Walter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miller v. Trusewych
as 3:2024cv03149
Plaintiff: Terrence Miller
Defendant: Zorian Trusewych
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. IDOC Medical Department et al
as 3:2024cv03154
Plaintiff: Keytori M. Jackson
Defendant: IDOC Medical Department, . Fennell and IDOC Administration Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03155
Plaintiff: Kevin James
Defendant: LaToya Hughes and J B Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Arbanal et al
as 2:2024cv02081
Plaintiff: Otis Carr
Defendant: . Arbanal, . Wilham, Douglas County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erdmann v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01151
Plaintiff: Diane Renee Erdmann
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Span v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01215
Plaintiff: Samuel Span
Defendant: Mindi Nurse, LaToya Hughes and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Haynes et al
as 4:2024cv04103
Plaintiff: Joshua Poe
Defendant: . Haynes, . Stevenson, . Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?