Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Magnotti v. Curran et al
as 4:2023cv04215
Plaintiff:
Angalo C Magnotti
Defendant:
Adam Curran, City of Spring Valley Illinois, Spring Valley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBroom v. TransUnion Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv03270
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
Transunion Corporation, Latoya Hughes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Jaimeson Cody et al v. Sangamon County et al
as 3:2022cv03065
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jaimeson Cody and Daniel Cody
Defendant:
Sangamon County, Andrew Van Meter, Jack Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staake v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv03254
Defendant:
Peter/Pricilla Poe 1-2, Illinois Department of Corrections, Richard Roe 1-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jared M Staake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Doe et al
as 3:2018cv03133
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hughes
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollister v. Hammers et al
as 1:2018cv01192
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hollister
Defendant:
. Hammers, . Smith, . Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greyer v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2018cv03070
Plaintiff:
Fabian Greyer
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe 1, C/O Busby, L. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunkhorst v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01426
Plaintiff:
Curtis Brunkhorst
Defendant:
John Baldwin, S A Godinez, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv03185
Plaintiff:
Darryl Perry
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Kess Roberson, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisle v. Fike et al
as 1:2017cv01335
Plaintiff:
Steven D Lisle, Jr.
Defendant:
J Fike, R Battle, . Pitchford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
