Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Shah v. Heuerman et al
as 2:2020cv02168
Plaintiff:
Herbert Shah
Defendant:
Shane Cook, Karee Voges, Dustin D Heuerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Heurman et al
as 2:2020cv02113
Plaintiff:
Derick A Cox
Defendant:
Shane Cook, Karee Voges, Dustin Heurman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Heuerman et al
as 2:2020cv02114
Defendant:
Shane Cook, Dustin Heuerman, Karee Voges and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari M Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Hartshorn et al
as 2:2018cv02317
Defendant:
Matthew Barrett, Patrick Hartshorn and Colin Osterbur
Plaintiff:
David Blake Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Shannon
as 3:2018cv03198
Plaintiff:
Vick Barrett
Defendant:
Deb Shannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett et al v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2012cv03095
Plaintiff:
Donnie Barrett, Michael Halbrook, Kenneth Seidler and others
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Human Services, Forrest Ashby, Reggy Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smego et al v. Ashby et al
as 3:2011cv03395
Plaintiff:
Richard M Smego, Jeremy Schloss, Charles Brand and others
Defendant:
Forrest J Ashby, James Clayton, Marie Durant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schloss et al v. Ashby et al
as 3:2011cv03337
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Schloss, Ronald Levi, Don Evans and others
Defendant:
Forest Ashby, Alfreda Kibby, Larry J Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halbrook et al v. Aramark Food Services Corp et al
as 3:2011cv03190
Plaintiff:
Michael Halbrook and Donnie Barrett
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Corp, Larry J Phillips, Alfreda Kibby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Phillips et al
as 3:2010cv03254
Plaintiff:
Donnie Barrett
Defendant:
Larry J Phillips, Jennifer Blaesing and Marie Durant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
