Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Blakey v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Carroll Blakey
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne, Tiffany Clark, Kellie Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Giles
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Chance Jones, Cherryle Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01411
Plaintiff:
Kelly A Lee
Defendant:
Matt Smith, Woodford County Illinois, Dennis Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krumey v. Duffy et al
as 4:2023cv04158
Plaintiff:
Jospeh Edward Krumey, III
Defendant:
Travis Duffy, Kelly Twaddle, Anthony Wasielewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dangerfield v. Rees et al
as 1:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Amantae Dangerfield
Defendant:
Karen Norman Rees, Illinois River's Penitentiary, Kellie Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vistante v. Twaddle et al
as 4:2023cv04125
Plaintiff:
Jonah Vistante
Defendant:
Kelly Twaddle, Nicole Johnson, Joshua Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Schachtrup et al
as 1:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
George E Love
Defendant:
Christopher Schachtrup, Christopher Hofmann, Brian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyjak v. Street et al
as 3:2023cv03056
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Defendant:
Kelly Street and Corey Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Roger et al
as 1:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Larry G Harris
Defendant:
Daniel Roger, Kellie Dennis and . Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01453
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, . Mindi, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
