Cases 11 - 20 of 159
Winston v. Shah et al
as 4:2023cv04224
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Viper Shah, . Savage, . Shawgo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Keithley et al
as 4:2023cv04208
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Tracy Keithley, A Hoyt, S Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04203
Plaintiff:
Milton Anderson
Defendant:
Gregory Donathan, C. Parsons and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racanelli v. Pritizker et al
as 4:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
J B Pritizker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. Shawgo et al
as 4:2023cv04178
Plaintiff:
David Wilkerson
Defendant:
Zach Shawgo, Illinois Department of Human Services, Greg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loy v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
John Loy
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Sharon Coleman-Deems, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitzpatrick v. Busche et al
as 4:2023cv04111
Plaintiff:
Martin C Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Robert Busche, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Hefly et al
as 4:2022cv04189
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Y Hefly, S Jumper, G Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanson v. Scott et al
as 4:2022cv04163
Plaintiff:
John Swanson
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Greg Donathan, Eric Kunkel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
