Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Doe v. Golding et al
as 2:2021cv02287
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Anthony J Golding, Coles County Sheriff James Rankin, Coles County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten et al v. Rochester Township Republican Central Committee et al
as 3:2021cv03023
Plaintiff:
Darin Whitten, William D. Kaiser, Dorothy Taft and others
Defendant:
Don Gray, Rochester Township Republican Central Committee, Thomas K. Munroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waas v. City of Champaign Illinois et al
as 2:2020cv02174
Defendant:
Jami Painter, City of Champaign Police Department, Michael Swaney and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene L Waas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pappas v. City of Peoria et al
as 1:2020cv01200
Defendant:
Joe Dulin, Jerald McKean, Patrick Urich and others
Plaintiff:
John S Pappas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04088
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Penny v. Pelosi et al
as 2:2020cv02047
Defendant:
Antonio Delgado, Sharice Davids, Cheri Bustos and others
Plaintiff:
David H Penny and David Harold Penny
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Colson v. City of Urbana et al
as 2:2020cv02014
Defendant:
Lt. Richard Surles, Anthony Meenely, City of Urbana and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Colson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al vs NNDYM KB Inc et al
as 2:2019cv02345
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Davis and Anthony Davis
Defendant:
NNDYM KB INC and Samir Chaudhari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
