Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Doe #1 et al v Murphy et al
as 2:2016cv02393
Plaintiff: Jane Doe #1 , Jane Doe #2 , Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant: David Murphy, Robert Windmiller, George McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02219
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02206
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02204
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Raney et al v. Morgan County et al
as 3:2015cv03253
Plaintiff: Douglas Raney , Michael Shackelford and Tim Hagen
Defendant: Morgan County, Randy Duvendack, Derek Suttles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Figgs et al v. Dawson et al
as 3:2013cv03218
Plaintiff: Livell Figgs
Defendant: Alex Dawson , Austin S Randolph, Jr , Lori Fishel and others
Respondent: John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Stolz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01473
Plaintiff: John R Banks
Defendant: Jeff Stolz, Ryan Smith, Nathan Usinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holbrook v. Kankakee County et al
as 2:2012cv02215
Plaintiff: Douglas Holbrook
Defendant: Kankakee County, Timothy F Bukowski, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 1:2012cv01251
Plaintiff: Bamako Walton
Defendant: City of Jacksonville, Rodney Cox, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Buckles v. Thompson et al
as 1:2012cv01194
Plaintiff: Arick Buckles
Defendant: John E. Thompson , William J. Redshaw , L. Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?