Cases 11 - 20 of 232
Savory v. Cannon et al
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Lee Savory
Defendant:
William Cannon, Sr., Marcella Brown Teplitz, Stefanie Tarr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. The Barn of Quincy, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03102
Plaintiff:
Jazzpher Evans
Defendant:
The Barn of Quincy, Inc., Backwoods Vending, Inc. d/b/a The Well Dance & Night Club, Steve William Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Allen v. Cole
as 2:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman Allen
Defendant:
William E.F. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Benson v. Knox County et al
as 4:2023cv04034
Plaintiff:
Jon Benson
Defendant:
Knox County, Sheriff Jack Harlan, Jr., Deputy Shawn Bay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kimbrell v. Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Jody D Kimbrell and Jody Kimbrell
Defendant:
Housing and Urban Development, Bank of America, NA, Brian T Moyniham and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bliven v. U S Marshall
as 3:2022cv03187
Plaintiff:
William G Bliven
Defendant:
U S Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Mockbee et al
as 2:2022cv02122
Plaintiff:
Shacoya Moore
Defendant:
Charles Mockbee, William Roberts, Steve Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
