Cases 71 - 80 of 111
Lamano v. Peoria County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2014cv01443
Plaintiff:
Christina Lamano
Defendant:
Peoria County Circuit Court, Jeremy H Lamano, Sr., Mark E Gilles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dhermy v. Doe et al
as 2:2014cv02259
Plaintiff:
Paul John Dhermy
Defendant:
John Doe, I, Jeff Branson , Timothy Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hosea v. Lutes et al
as 1:2014cv01399
Plaintiff:
Jason Hosea
Defendant:
Jim Lutes, Tom Dewry, Bloomington Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newman v. Kern et al
as 1:2014cv01302
Plaintiff:
Ryan Newman
Defendant:
. Kern , John Doe, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taggart v. Montgomery County et al
as 3:2014cv03187
Plaintiff:
Lucas J Taggart
Defendant:
Montgomery County , Jim Vazzi , Matthew Reents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. U S Marshal et al
as 4:2014cv04012
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Campbell
Defendant:
Crouch, John Doe and Erica .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dorothy McLaughlin v. Dr. Tilden et al
as 1:2013cv01600
Plaintiff:
Dorothy McLaughlin
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
Dr. Tilden, John Doe Pontiac Medical Personnel and Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. City of Carlinville et al
as 3:2013cv03365
Plaintiff:
Henry J Johnston
Defendant:
City of Carlinville, Aaron Key, Clay Hoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Figgs et al v. Dawson et al
as 3:2013cv03218
Plaintiff:
Livell Figgs
Defendant:
Alex Dawson , Austin S Randolph, Jr , Lori Fishel and others
Respondent:
John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Ford County et al
as 2:2013cv02115
Defendant:
Ford County, Mark Doran, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
