Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Diamond et al v. Logan County, Illinois et al
as 3:2019cv03217
Defendant:
Ben Roland, Ashley Williams, Mark Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan L. Diamond, Jason Ray Harlow, Kathy Diamond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Larry et al
as 3:2016cv03199
Plaintiff:
James D Lewis, F.B.I., Barack Obama and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Treasury, Bruce Rauner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoffman v. Dewitt County, Illinois et al
as 3:2015cv03026
Plaintiff:
Terry Hoffman
Defendant:
County of DeWitt , Jered Shofner , Anthony Monaghan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russel v. Village of Peoria Heights, an Illinois Local Governmental Entity et al
as 1:2012cv01171
Plaintiff:
Ben Russel
Defendant:
Village of Peoria Heights, William Switzer, J Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruhl v. Residences et al
as 1:2008cv01216
Plaintiff:
Edwin P Bruhl, .
Defendant:
Immanuel Residences, Life Link, LaSalle Bank and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bloomer v. Broderson et al
as 4:2007cv04050
Plaintiff:
Steve Bloomer
Defendant:
C Broderson, Joe McCaffrey, M Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruhl v. Slotky et al
as 3:2007cv03179
Plaintiff:
Edwin P Bruhl, .
Defendant:
Ben Slotky, McLean County Sheriff, McLean County Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
