Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Hunt v. Glossip et al
as 4:2022cv04042
Plaintiff:
JaJuan Hunt
Defendant:
Louis Glossip, Brad Abernathy and Jose Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Heuerman
as 2:2022cv02045
Petitioner:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Respondent:
Dustin D Heuerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hunt v. Champaign County Court et al
as 2:2022cv02040
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Champaign County Court, State Attorneys, Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. County of Champaign Illinois et al
as 2:2022cv02036
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
County of Champaign Illinois, Wellpath to Hope and Healing, Dustin Heuerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Securus Technologies Inc et al
as 2:2021cv02272
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Securus Technologies Inc, Robert Pickins, Dustin Heuerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfrey-Bey v. Burle et al
as 3:2021cv03235
Plaintiff:
Albert Winfrey-Bey
Defendant:
Amy Burle, Jon Fatheree, David Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Dorethy
as 4:2019cv04254
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Scott D. Hunt and Scott D Hunt
Respondent:
Stephanie Dorethy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burch v. Polley et al
as 3:2018cv03057
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Burch
Defendant:
Cecil Polley, . Griffin, Scott Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. DiFanis et al
as 2:2017cv02305
Petitioner:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Respondent:
Thomas J Difanis, Julia Rietz, Sarah Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. Cartwright et al
as 2:2017cv02302
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Holmes
Defendant:
Shelle Cartwright, Lisa Creason, Kent E Brookmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
