Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Jordan v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01304
Plaintiff:
Ditarius Jordan
Defendant:
William Smith, Deniese Carter, Jodi King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allsebrooke v. Logan County et al
as 3:2020cv03133
Plaintiff:
Jason Allsebrooke
Defendant:
Mark Landers, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Rachel King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholas v. Logan County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv03066
Plaintiff:
Richard J Nicholas
Defendant:
Logan County Jail, Mark Landers, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Defendant:
. Ramarize, Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Settles v. Hammers et al
as 1:2020cv01036
Defendant:
. King, . McConoghy, Jennifer Meaker and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Settles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kolczak v. Tazewell County Sheriffs Department and/or Justice Center et al
as 1:2019cv01405
Plaintiff:
Dustin Mark Kolczak
Defendant:
Cheryl Potts, Rebecca Melloy, Curtis King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cullum v. Streit-Cox et al
as 4:2019cv04245
Defendant:
Aaron M Streit-Cox, . Sherer, . Staumburg and others
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Behning v. Johnson et al
as 4:2019cv04225
Defendant:
Scott W Stewart, Paula Young, Mark Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Randall J Behning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dishman v. King et al
as 2:2019cv02138
Defendant:
Lindsey S Clark, Officer King and Julia R Rietz
Plaintiff:
Byron Eugene Dishman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
