Cases 61 - 70 of 91
Hill v. Rios
as 1:2013cv01422
Petitioner:
Anthony Hill
Respondent:
Ricardo Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Booth v. Akpore
as 1:2013cv01357
Petitioner:
Aaron Booth
Respondent:
Kevwe Akpore
Defendant:
Scanning Program - Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Utley
as 2:2013cv02150
Petitioner:
Dwight Antwain Hill
Respondent:
Jim Utley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoskins v. Streight et al
as 4:2013cv04049
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Hoskins
Defendant:
Robert D Streight, Dan Williams, Amy Damm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellogg v. Reichardt et al
as 1:2013cv01245
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kellogg
Defendant:
. Reichardt, Daniel Hoffman, Campton Hills Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tribbett v. Durkin et al
as 1:2013cv01169
Plaintiff:
Shawn D. Tribbett
Defendant:
Patrick D Durkin, Steve R. Gans and Hill Corr. Ctr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rentfro et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv02056
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Rentfro , Sherwin Savage , Robert Hendricks and others
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael Puisis, Louis Schicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Yorkovich et al
as 1:2013cv01016
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hall
Defendant:
Joseph Yorkovich, Gregory J Gossett, J Collin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Pfister et al
as 1:2012cv01279
Plaintiff:
Henry Hill
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Marvin Reed, Louis Shicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Yurkovich et al
as 1:2012cv01143
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Joseph Yurkovich, Bradley Livingston, Clifford Sangster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
