Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Mills v. Zanger et al
as 3:2024cv03148
Plaintiff:
Erik Mills
Defendant:
. Zanger and . Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sitzes et al v. Elyea et al
as 1:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Clayton W Sitzes, Ryan Mills, Patrick Murphy and others
Defendant:
Willard O Elyea, Michael Puisis, Steven Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01099
Petitioner:
Kandis Mills
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mills v. USA
as 2:2022cv02055
Petitioner:
Kandis Mills
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley et al v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv03117
Plaintiff:
Brian Cooley, Robert Loveland and Edwin Rodriguez
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, Jeff Korte, Wexford Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Wexford Health Source Inc et al
as 3:2015cv03190
Plaintiff:
Henry L Mack
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc, Ken O'Hallan, Elaine Gedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Mills et al
as 3:2015cv03050
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Hopkins
Defendant:
Rhonda Mills, Dr. Thomas Baker, Nurse Kaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Olson et al
as 3:2014cv03370
Plaintiff:
Henry L Mack
Defendant:
M Olson, . Williams, . Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. State Tactic Unit et al
as 3:2014cv03295
Plaintiff:
Rafael Kennedy
Defendant:
. Icenogle, . Beswick, . Derhake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
