Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Wieland v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01398
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rick Wieland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chambers v. Harrington et al
as 1:2013cv01289
Petitioner:
Taurean D Chambers
Respondent:
Rick Harrington and The People of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Secura Insurance Company v. Rick R. Plumb d/b/a Superior Home Improvement et al
as 4:2013cv04054
Plaintiff:
Secura Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rick R. Plumb d/b/a Superior Home Improvement and Linda J Plumb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Purdle et al v. McCoy et al
as 1:2013cv01269
Plaintiff:
Timothy Purdle, David Buford, Antoine Sims and others
Defendant:
Michael D McCoy, Rob McCoy, Brian Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Harrington
as 4:2013cv04053
Petitioner:
Antwan D Price
Respondent:
Rick Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orr v. Harrington
as 4:2013cv04052
Petitioner:
Willie D Orr
Respondent:
Rick Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Harrington
as 2:2013cv02108
Petitioner:
Emmanuel D Lewis
Respondent:
Rick Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Harrington
as 2:2013cv02105
Petitioner:
Anthony Swayne Harris
Respondent:
Rick Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Karmatzis v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv03121
Plaintiff:
Thomas Karmatzis
Defendant:
Thomas Baker, T Still, W Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
