Cases 1 - 10 of 1,754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Zolicoffer v. OSF Healthcare Saint Francis Medical Center et al
as 1:2024cv01322
Defendant:
OSF Healthcare Saint Francis Medical Center, DO Christian G, MD Kothawala Saad and others
Plaintiff:
Talya Zolicoffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Koehler v. Shumm et al
as 1:2024cv01306
Defendant:
City of Pontiac Illinois and Derek Shumm
Plaintiff:
Travis J Koehler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
v. Ray et al
as 2:2024cv02199
Defendant:
Brian Ray, K A Borders, K J Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ray v. City of Decatur Illinois et al
as 2:2024cv02200
Defendant:
K A Borders, N D Pulkrabek, C W Zilz and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Boards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02198
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
William H. Boards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lugo v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02183
Plaintiff:
Marshall S. Lugo
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01252
Plaintiff:
Jordan Nicole Dyer
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
USA v. Dewitte
as 1:2024cv01249
Defendant:
Michael J Dewitte
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Bogle v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03184
Plaintiff:
Kurt Bogle
Defendant:
Seth Thibodeau, Brandon Norris, Phil Crary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
