Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Scheurich v. Ford County et al
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
David E Scheurich
Defendant:
Ford County, Ford County Sheriff's Office, Mark Doran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. USA
as 1:2023cv01337
Petitioner:
Paris Hunter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hunter v. Entzel et al
as 1:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
Paris Hunter
Defendant:
Frederick Entzel, Steve Kisner and Angela Forcum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hunter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv02009
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson-Barker v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01234
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jonson-Barker and Lisa Johnson-Barker
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Illinois Department of Corrections, Robert Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hunter v. FCI Pekin
as 1:2021cv01085
Defendant:
FCI Pekin
Plaintiff:
Paris Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Followel et al
as 1:2021cv01057
Defendant:
Todd McClusky, David Fitt, McLean County and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W Ware and Robert Ware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter Bloomington Properties LLC v. 512 UCAL LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02317
Defendant:
University Communities LLC and 512 UCAL LLC
Plaintiff:
Hunter Bloomington Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
