Cases 51 - 60 of 679
Williams v. Eddy et al
as 1:2022cv06934
Petitioner:
Christopher Williams
Respondent:
Melinda Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv06607
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Jones
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept., Lopez, A.J. Poslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allman v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2022cv06488
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allman
Defendant:
Hernandez, Martinez, Monroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuellar v. Mindi et al
as 1:2022cv05869
Petitioner:
Juan Cuellar
Respondent:
Mindi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Aleksiejczyk et al
as 1:2022cv05906
Plaintiff:
Demetrus Demorya Williams
Defendant:
Aleksiejczyk, Johnson, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Doe 1-18 et al
as 1:2022cv05846
Plaintiff:
Martin Lyons
Defendant:
John Doe 1-18, Jane Doe 1-14, Wexford Health Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv05679
Plaintiff:
Jordan Jalil Curry
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections, Cook County Department of Corrections Cermak, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milner v. Nominal et al
as 1:2022cv04916
Plaintiff:
Anthony Milner
Defendant:
Tom Dart Nominal, Tom Dart, President and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Jeffries
as 1:2022cv04538
Petitioner:
Mr. Charles Soto
Respondent:
Rob Jeffries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Comier v. Wills
as 1:2022cv04432
Plaintiff:
Marion Andre Comier
Defendant:
Warden Anthony Wills and Anthony Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
