Cases 21 - 30 of 1,139
Fisher v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv16665
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Fisher
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections and Staff, Sheriffs, & those in Positions of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston v. Lovell et al
as 1:2023cv16301
Plaintiff:
Herman Dave Johnston, Jr.
Defendant:
Lovell, V.A. Hosiptal and V.A. Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Truitt et al
as 1:2023cv16111
Plaintiff:
Marshawn Wright
Defendant:
Charles Truitt, Frances Milsap, Haskeemah Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2023cv15252
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Kernel, Tom J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Longstreet
as 1:2023cv14768
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ray Longstreet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Brooks v. Duffy et al
as 1:2023cv14425
Plaintiff:
Margaret G. Brooks
Defendant:
William M. Duffy, Brian J. Hurst, Michelle Keefe-Radke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salter v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14421
Plaintiff:
Phillip Salter
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Hester
as 1:2023cv14306
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Andrew Hester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Creekmore v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14057
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Creekmore
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv07782
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
