Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 111 - 120 of 23,853
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 1:2024cv03862
Plaintiff: Gregoy D Jones
Defendant: Judge Hooker, 4th Distr Cppt-Cpt- Clerk (J Doe) or rep. and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Galor et al
as 3:2024cv50179
Plaintiff: John Hall
Defendant: Patric Galor and Ben Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Costello et al
as 3:2024cv50178
Plaintiff: Christopher Ryan
Defendant: Terry Costello, Trish Senneff and James Fagerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Gary
as 1:2024cv03818
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Charles Gary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Amaya v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv03828
Petitioner: Daniel Amaya
Respondent: Chance Jones, Latoya Hughes and Kwame Raoulm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vinet v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03807
Petitioner: Richard J. Vinet
Respondent: State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2024cv03822
Plaintiff: Amireon Williams
Defendant: John D. Idleburg, N. Kalfas and Gholar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50176
Plaintiff: Dan Smith
Defendant: Director Latoya Hughes, Warden Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02216
Plaintiff: Shunte Lamont Mayfield
Defendant: Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 3:2024cv50139
Petitioner: Dennis Sullivan
Respondent: Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?