Cases 81 - 90 of 23,819
Bogan v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03799
Plaintiff:
Leah Bogan
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. County Of Will et al
as 1:2024cv03792
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
County Of Will, Nicolas Keedy, Anthony Gomez Delacasa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balzan v. CCDOC et al
as 1:2024cv03720
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Reyes Balzan
Defendant:
CCDOC, Tom Dart and CCDOC Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinson v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03741
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Brinson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rogers v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03739
Plaintiff:
Kavarian Rogers
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Murphy v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv03745
Plaintiff:
Celena Murphy
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Mulaney et al
as 1:2024cv02656
Petitioner:
Lennie Perry
Respondent:
Charles William Mulaney, Michelle Marie Petersen, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
King v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03704
Petitioner:
Andre King
Respondent:
of America United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cobb v. Lake County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv03707
Plaintiff:
Murray Cobb
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Nicholas Kalfas, Taryn Weiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03701
Plaintiff:
Yarnell Hicks
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and CCDOC Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
