Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Smith v. North Chicago, City of et al
as 1:2012cv05760
Plaintiff:
Paul Smith
Defendant:
Emir King and City of North Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
King v. Illinois Department Of Corrections(IDOC)
as 1:2012cv05450
Plaintiff:
Charles King
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections(IDOC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pindak et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv04005
Plaintiff:
Kim Pindak , John Hall , McArthur Hubbard and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Theresa Nazario , John Bakopoulus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siwula v. Lake County, Illinois et al
as 1:2012cv02096
Plaintiff:
Eileen Siwula
Defendant:
Lake County, Illinois, Mark Curran, Jennifer Witherspoon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Perez
as 1:2011cv05580
Plaintiff:
Gregory King
Defendant:
Pat Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Tynan et al
as 1:2011cv05434
Plaintiff:
Gregory King
Defendant:
Bill Tynan, Roger Anderson and City of St. Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starvish et al v. Village of Tinley Park, The et al
as 1:2011cv04963
Plaintiff:
Brian Starvish
Defendant:
Village of Tinley Park, The, Brian Szymusiak, Patrick St. John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. South Chicago Dodge Chrysler Jeep, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00502
Plaintiff:
Carlton King
Defendant:
South Chicago Dodge Chrysler Jeep, Inc. and Richard Ruscitti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Harvey et al v. Calumet City et al
as 1:2010cv04148
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Harvey , Conception Harvey , Cashimir King and others
Defendant:
Calumet City, Dan Zorzi and Ofc. Rivas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brantley v. County of DeKalb, Illinois et al
as 3:2010cv50075
Plaintiff:
David Brantley
Defendant:
County of DeKalb, Illinois, DeKalb County Sheriff's Department, Roger Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
