Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Green et al v. Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv02918
Plaintiff:
Julissa Green, Danasha Mccory and Baylie Bell
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Anthony Ceja, Joseph Deferville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lara et al v. Backus et al
as 1:2019cv01086
Plaintiff:
Eleftherios Koutsogiannis, Rosa Santiago, Cesar Lara and others
Defendant:
Trooper Nathaniel C. Lunt (#6071), Trooper Thomas J. Marshall (#6073), Trooper Dennis T. Kranc (#5014) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosas v. Advocate Christ Medical Center et al
as 1:2018cv05340
Defendant:
MacNeal Hospital, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Madden Mental Health Center and others
Plaintiff:
Maria M. Rosas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosas v. Elizondo et al
as 1:2018cv03933
Defendant:
Xavier Elizondo, David Salgado, Other Unknown Chicago Police Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Rosas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosas v. Loancare
as 1:2016cv07442
Plaintiff:
Israel Rosas
Defendant:
Loancare
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Espinoza et al v. Burdett et al
as 1:2015cv08108
Plaintiff:
Rosa Espinoza and Erika Espinoza
Defendant:
Richard Burdett, Joseph Cassidy, Sean Talbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda v. Burger King Worldwide, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02966
Plaintiff:
Rosa Miranda
Defendant:
Burger King Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
A.B. et al v. Holliman et al
as 1:2014cv07897
Plaintiff:
A. B. , R. B. and Rochelle Vermeulen
Defendant:
Carolyn Holliman, Clara Yanes, Alexis Carlisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castaneda v. Gomez
as 1:2014cv07166
Plaintiff:
Rosa Castaneda
Defendant:
Octavio Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cavada et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv01916
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Cavada , Patricia Cavada and Ricardo Aguilar
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Gonzalez, Salgado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
