Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,450
Common v. Beauty Supply Owner et al
as 1:2024cv02860
Plaintiff: Joseph L. Common
Defendant: Beauty Supply Owner and Occupant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Alegria et al
as 1:2024cv02851
Plaintiff: Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant: A Alegria, T Berecz and J Guevara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ealy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv04091
Plaintiff: Courtney Ealy
Defendant: Sharon Oden Johnson, Micheal Hyman and Sanjay Tailor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Roberson et al
as 1:2024cv04021
Plaintiff: Drew Logan
Defendant: J.D Roberson, D.R Clark, LeAnn Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bynum v. City of Bridgton Police Dept.
as 1:2024cv04029
Plaintiff: Darryl R Bynum, Jr
Defendant: City of Bridgton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. White et al
as 1:2024cv04003
Plaintiff: Dimari Terry
Defendant: Raymond White, Reinaldo Sanchez, Jerrell Danner-Lardino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McClurge v. City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv03914
Plaintiff: Christopher McClurge
Defendant: City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Cook v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv02401
Plaintiff: Travis Cook
Defendant: Sheriff of Cook County and Cook County Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 1:2024cv03862
Plaintiff: Gregoy D Jones
Defendant: Judge Hooker, 4th Distr Cppt-Cpt- Clerk (J Doe) or rep. and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinet v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03807
Petitioner: Richard J. Vinet
Respondent: State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?