Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christmas v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Demond Christmas
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzer, Iris Y. Martinez, Brendan F. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBroom v. TransUnion Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04151
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
TransUnion Corporation, Latoya Hughes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Melrose Park of Illinois, Mayor et al
as 1:2022cv05207
Plaintiff:
Jhamar Khalid Howard
Defendant:
Melrose Park of Illinois, Mayor, John/Jane Doe, Melrose Park Police John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gwinn v. City of Waukegan, The et al
as 1:2020cv06685
Defendant:
Unknown John & Jane Does, Lake County Meg Agents, Lake County, Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Eugene Gwinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Doe et al
as 1:2019cv06993
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #2 and John/Jane Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Shaune Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv06375
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Chicago Police Department (CPD), Superintendent McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Unknown Party et al
as 1:2018cv05004
Defendant:
Jane Doe No. 22, Jane Does 1-10, Tarry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Harley M Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendall v. Doe et al
as 1:2014cv06106
Plaintiff:
Ralph Kendall
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, R Teverbaugh, Parole Officer Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv01970
Plaintiff:
Clarence B. Williamson, III
Defendant:
Dorothy Brown, Jennifer Smith, Robbin Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
